We are proud of our appellate track record. Firm leader, Thomas E. Downey Jr. has appeared in federal appellate courts and state appellate courts in Colorado, Arizona and Ohio. Some of our appeals have made a significant contribution to the development of the law in Colorado in the areas of insurance coverage, governmental immunity, property tax, and personal injury negligence.
In one such case, the Colorado Supreme Court decision, Scott vs. Matlack, the court clarified the use of OSHA standards and regulations as evidence of the standard of care in negligence cases.
Related: RX Green Countersues Over False Claims, Alleged Violations of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act
We critically examine the issues to be appealed, conduct thorough research, use our excellent writing skills to draft convincing appellate briefs, and make forceful oral arguments.
We are proud of our aggressive and ethical client representation. Tom Downey serves on several bar associations and other committees devoted to the ethical practice of law.
To speak with an experienced lawyer about a possible appeal, call us at (303) 813-1111 or email us through our contact page. Downey & Associates PC are available for free initial consultations for those who qualify. We make evening appointments and can accept credit cards.
Our firm conducts a thorough case evaluation, examining the trial court's proceedings, identifying potential grounds for appeal, and providing clients with a realistic assessment of the appeal's prospects. This careful preparation is crucial for achieving success in appellate courts in Denver and beyond.
Common grounds for appeal include legal errors, such as incorrect jury instructions, improper admission of evidence, or misapplication of the law. Downey & Associates, PC's expertise in Denver appellate law ensures that all viable grounds are explored to strengthen your case on appeal.
Appellate courts review issues under standards like de novo for pure law, abuse of discretion for many trial rulings, and clear error for certain fact findings. The standard of review sets the level of deference the appellate court gives the trial court. Choosing and arguing the correct standard can be outcome-determinative. Colorado appellate briefs must identify and support the standard used for each issue. Framing issues to fit a more favorable standard is a core appellate strategy. The Colorado Judicial Branch’s guidance on opening briefs explains how to present standards of review.
Sometimes, but only in limited circumstances. Colorado allows discretionary interlocutory appeals when the trial court certifies an order and the Court of Appeals accepts review. This route is reserved for important controlling questions that may materially advance the case. The process and criteria are set by Colorado Appellate Rule 4.2. Interlocutory review requires careful timing and targeted petitions. You can read the rule in the official rule change document.
Appeals start by filing a Notice of Appeal and designating transcripts within a short deadline after entry of judgment. In 2025, the Colorado Supreme Court amended the rules to require the Notice of Appeal within 21 days in many civil cases, with some exceptions. Post-trial motions under C.R.C.P. 59 can affect timing, so coordination is essential. Early tasks include ordering transcripts, securing the record, and calendaring all briefing deadlines. Missing a deadline can forfeit the appeal. See the 2025 rule change for the current timing requirements.
Filing an appeal involves strict deadlines, and missing these can forfeit your right to appeal. At Downey & Associates, PC, we prioritize prompt action to ensure all necessary documents are filed on time, protecting your interests and maximizing your chances of a successful appeal. For more details, please contact us for a consultation.